Header image  
How readable are your texts?  
line decor
line decor


ADAMS, S.J. Scripts and the recognition of unfamiliar vocabulary: Enhancing second language reading skills. Modern Language Journal,  66:155-159, 1982.
AEBERSOLD, J. A. & FIELD, M. L. From Reader to Reading Teacher. Issues and strategies for second language classrooms. Cambridge University Press, 1997.
ALBRECHT, J.E. & O'BRIEN, E.J. Updating a mental model: Maintaining both local and global coherence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 19:1061-1070, 1993.
ALDERSON, J.C Testing reading comprehension skills (P1) Reading in a Foreign Language, 6: 425-438, 1990.
ALDERSON, J.C. & URQUHART, A.H. (eds.) Reading in a Foreign Language. Longman. 1984.
ALDERSON, J.C. & URQUHART, A.H. This test is unfair: I'm not an economist. In: CARRELL, P.,  DEVINE, J. & ESKEY, D. (Eds.)  Interactive approaches to second language reading. New York. Cambridge University Press, 1988, pp168-182.
ANDERSON, R.C. & DAVISON, A. Conceptual and empirical bases of readability formulas. In: DAVISON, A. & GREEN, G.M.  (Eds.) Linguistic complexity and text comprehension: Readability issues reconsidered.  Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988, pp23-53.
ANDERSON, R.C. & PEARSON, P.D. A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension. In: CARRELL, P., DEVINE, J. & ESKEY, D. (Eds.)  Interactive approaches to second language reading. New York. Cambridge University Press, 1988. pp37-55.
ANDERSON, R.C., REYNOLDS, R.E., SCHALLERT, D.L. & GOETZ, E.T. Frameworks for comprehending discourse. American Educational Research Journal, 14, 4:367-381, 1977.
ARMBRUSTER, R.B. The problem of "inconsiderate text". In: DUFFY, G.C. , ROEHLER, L. & MASON, J. (Eds.) Comprehension instruction, perspectives and suggestions. New York: Longman, 1984. 
ARNAUD, P.J.L. & SAVIGNON, S.J. In: Rare words, complex lexical units and the advanced learner. In: Coady, J. & Huckin, T. (Eds.) Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition, 1997, pp157-173.
AUSUBEL, D.P. The use of advance organisers in the learning and retention of meaningful material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 51:267-72, 1960. 
AUSUBEL, D.P. In defense of advance organizers: a reply to the critics. Review of Educational Research, 48:251-258, 1978. 
AUSUBEL, D.P. & FITZGERALD, D. Organiser, general background and antecedent learning variables in sequential and verbal learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 53:243-9, 1962.
BAKER, E.L., ATWOOD, N.K. & DUFFY, T.M. Cognitive Approaches to Assessing the Readability of Text. In: DAVISON & GREEN  (Eds.) Linguistic complexity and text comprehension: Readability issues reconsidered. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988, pp55- 83. 
BARNETT, M.A. Syntactic and lexical/semantic skill in foreign language reading. Importance and interaction. Modern Language Journal, 70:343-9, 1986.
BARNETT, M.A. Reading through context: How real and perceived strategy use affects L2 comprehension. Modern Language Journal, 72:150-159, 1988.
BARRET, T.C. What is reading? In CLYMER, T. Innovation and change in reading instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1968.
BARTLETT, F.C. Remembering. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1932. 
BATEMAN, J.A. & RONDHUIS, K.J. Coherence Relations: Towards a general specification. Discourse Processes, 24:3-49, 1997.
BEAMAN, K. Coordination and Subordination Revisited: Syntactic Complexity in Spoken and Written Narrative Discourse. In: TANNEN, D. (Ed.) Coherence in Spoken and Written Discourse. Norwood NJ: Ablex, 1984, pp45-80.
BECK, I.L., McKEOWN, M.G., OMANSON, R.C. & POLE, M.T. Improving the comprehensibility of stories: The effects of revisions that improve coherence. Reading Research Quarterly, 19: 262-277, 1984.
BENSOUSSAN, M. & LAUFER, B. Lexical guessing in context in EFL reading comprehension. Journal of Research in Reading, 7:15-32, 1984.
BERMAN, R. Syntactic components of the FL reading process. In: ALDERSON, J.C. & URQUHART, A.H. (Eds.) Reading in a Foreign Language. Longman, 1984.
BERNHARDT, E.B. Toward an information processing perspective in foreign language reading. Modern Language Journal,  68:322-331, 1984.  
BHATIA, V.K. Syntactic discontinuity in legislative writing and its implications for academic and legal purposes. In: PUGH, A.K. & ULIJN, J.M. (Eds.) Reading for Professional Purposes: Studies and Practices in Native and Foreign Languages. London: Heinemann, 1984.
BINKLEY, M.R. New ways of assessing text difficulty. In: ZAKALUK, B.L. & SAMUELS, S.J. (Eds.) Readability: its past, present and future. Newark, DE: International Reading Association, 1988, pp98- 120.
BLACK, J.B. & BERN, H. Causal Coherence and Memory for Events in Narrative. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour,  20:267-275, 1981.
BLAU, E.K. The effect of syntax on readability for ESL students in Puerto Rico. TESOL Quarterly, 16:517-528, 1982.  
BLOCK, E. The comprehension strategies of second language readers. TESOL Quarterly,  20: 463-494, 1986.
BLOCK, E.L. See how they read: Comprehension monitoring of L1 and L2 reading TESOL Quarterly, 26: 319-343, 1992.
BLOOM, L., LAHEY, M., HOOD, L., LIFTER, K. & FIESS, K. Complex sentences: Acquisition of syntactic connectives and the semantic relations they encode. Journal of Child Language, 7:235-261, 1980.
BLOOR, T. & BLOOR, M. The Functional Analysis of English. A Hallidayan Approach. Arnold, 1995.
BORMUTH, J.R. & KLARE, G.R. Research Critiques: Development of Readability Analyses. Elementary English, 48: 675-681, 1971. 
BORMUTH, J.R. Cloze Test Readability: Criterion Reference Scores. Journal of Educational Measurement, 5: 189-196, 1968.
BORMUTH, J.R. Readability: A New Approach. Reading Research Quarterly, 1: 79-132, 1966.
BORMUTH, J.R. Experimental determination of the instructional reading level. In: FIGUREL, J.A. (Ed.)  Reading and Realism. Newark Delaware: International Reading Association, 1969.
BOVAIR, S. & KIERAS, D.E.  A guide to propositional analysis for research on technical prose. In: BRITTON, B.K. & BLACK, J.B. (Eds.) Understanding expository text: A theoretical and practical handbook for analyzing explanatory text. Hillsdale NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 1985, pp315-362.  
BRANSFORD, J.D. & JOHNSON, M.K. Cultural prerequisites for understanding: some investigations of comprehension and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 11, 717-726, 1972.
BRIDGE, C.A. & WINOGRAD, P.I. Reader's awareness of cohesive relationships during cloze comprehension. Journal of Reading Behaviour, 14, 299-312, 1982.
BRINTON, D.M., SNOW, A.S. & WESCHE, M.B. Content-Based Second Language Instruction. Newbury House, 1989.
BRITTON, B.K. & GÜLGÖZ, S Using Kintsch's computational model to improve instructional text: Effects of repairing inference call on recall and cognitive structures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83: 329-345, 1991.
BRITTON, B.K., MEYER, B.J., SIMPSON,R., HOLDREDGE, T.S. & CURRY, C. Effects of the organization on memory: Tests of two implications of a selective attention hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5:496-506, 1979.
BROWN, A.L., CAMPIONE, J.C. & DAY, J.D. Learning to learn: on training students to learn from texts. Educational Researcher, 10/2:14-21, 1981.
BROWN, T.S. & PERRY, F.L. (Jr.) A comparison of three learning strategies for ESL vocabulary acquisition. TESOL Quarterly,  25/4: 655-670, 1991.
BROWN, G. & YULE, G. Discourse Analysis. C.U.P., 1983.
BRUCE, B. & RUBIN, A. Readability formulas: matching tool and task. In: DAVISON & GREEN  (Eds.) Linguistic complexity and text comprehension: Readability issues reconsidered Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988, pp 5-22.
BOWLER, S. Plate tectonics. Extract from: Formation of Earth, Inside Science, New Scientist, vol. 152 no 2060,14th December, 1996.
CARRELL, P. Cohesion is not coherence. TESOL Quarterly, 16:479-88, 1982.
CARRELL, P.L. Some issues in studying the role of schemata, or background knowledge, in second language comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language, 1: 81-92, 1983.    
CARRELL, P.L. Three components of background knowledge in reading comprehension. Language Learning, 33:183-205, 1983.  
CARRELL, P.L. Evidence of a formal schema in second language comprehension. Language Learning, 34: 87-112, 1984.
CARRELL, P.L. Inferencing in ESL: Presuppositions and Implications of Factive and Implicative Predicates. Language Learning, 34/1:1-21, 1984.  
CARRELL, P.L. The Effects of Rhetorical organization on ESL readers. TESOL Quarterly, 18/3: 441-469, 1984.  
CARRELL, P.L. Facilitating ESL reading by teaching text structure. TESOL Quarterly, 19/4: 727-752, 1985.
CARRELL, P.L. Content and formal schemata in ESL reading. TESOL Quarterly,  21/3: 461-482,  1987.
CARRELL, P.L. Readability in ESL. Reading in a Foreign Language. 4: 21-40, 1987.  
CARRELL, P.L. Second Language reading: Reading ability or language proficiency. Applied Linguistics, 12:159-79, 1991.
CARRELL, P.L. Awareness of Text Structure: Effects on Recall. Language Learning, 42/4: 1-20, 1992.  
CARRELL, P., DEVINE, J. & ESKEY, D. (Eds.)  Interactive approaches to second language reading. New York. Cambridge University Press, 1988.
CARRELL, P.L. & EISTERHOLD, J.C. Schema theory and ESL reading pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly, 17: 553-573, 1983, reprinted in CARRELL, P., DEVINE, J. & ESKEY, D. (Eds.)  Interactive approaches to second language reading. New York. Cambridge University Press, 1988, pp73-92.
CARRELL, P.L. PHARIS, B.G. & LIBERTO, J.C. Metacognitive strategy training for ESL reading. TESOL Quarterly,  23/4: 647-678, 1989.
CARTON, A.S. Inferencing: A process in using and learning language. In: PIMSLEUR, P. & QUINN, T. (Eds.) The psychology of Second Language Learning. London: Cambridge University Press, 1971.
CARVER, R.P. Measuring Prose Difficulty Using the Rauding Scale. Reading Research Quarterly, 11/4: 660-85, 1975-76.
CHALL, J. Readability: An Appraisal of Research and Application. Columbus: Ohio State Univ. Press, 1958.
CHAUDRON, C. Simplification of input. Topic restatements and their effects on L2 learners' recognition and recall. TESOL Quarterly, 17: 437-458, 1983.
CHOMSKY, C. The Acquisition of Syntax in children from 5 to 10. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The M.I.T. Press, 1969.
CIRILO, R.K. Referential Coherence and Text Structure in Story Comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour,  20: 358-367, 1981.
CIRILO, R.K. & FOSS, D.J. Text structure and reading time for sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour,  19: 96-109, 1980.
CLARK, H. & SENGUL, C.J. In search of referents for nouns and pronouns. Memory and Cognition, 7:35-41, 1979.
CLARKE, H.H. & LUCY, P. Understanding what is meant from what is said: A study in conversationally conveyed requests. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 14: 56-72, 1975.
CLARKE, M, & SILBERSTEIN, S. Toward a realization of psycholinguistic principles for the ESL reading class. Language Learning, 27: 135-154, 1977.
COADY, J. Comments on Strother & Ulijn. In: DEVINE, J., CARRELL, P. & ESKEY, D (Eds.) Research in reading in English as a second language. Washington, DC: TESOL, 1987, pp101-103.
COADY, J. & HUCKIN, T. (Eds.) Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition. C.U.P., 1997.
COADY, J. L2 Vocabulary acquisition through extensive reading. In: COADY, J. & HUCKIN, T. (Eds.) Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition. C.U.P., 1997, pp225-237.
COHEN, J.H. The effect of content are material on cloze test performance. Journal of Reading, 19/3: 247-50, 1975.
COLEMAN, E.B. The comprehensibility of several grammatical transformations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 48:186-190, 1964.
COLEMAN, M. & LIAU, T.L. A computer readability formula designed for machine scoring Applied Psychology,  60: 283-284, 1975.
CONNOR, U. & McCAGG, P. Cross-cultural differences and perceived quality in written paraphrases of English expository prose. Applied Linguistics, 4/3: 259-268, 1983.
CONNOR, U. Recall of text: differences between first and second language readers. TESOL Quarterly, 18/2: 239-256, 1984.  
COOPER, M. Linguistic competence of practised and unpractised non-native readers of English. In: ALDERSON, J.C. & URQUHART, A.H. (Eds.) Reading in a Foreign Language. Longman, 1984, pp122-138.
CRAIK, E.I.M. & LOCKHART, R. Levels of processing: a framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 11:671-84, 1972.
DALE, E. & CHALL, J.S. A formula for predicting readability: Instructions. Educational Research Bulletin, 27: 37-54, 1948.
DAVIES. A. Simple, Simplified and Simplification: What is Authentic? In: ALDERSON, J.C. & URQUHART, A.H. (eds.) Reading in a Foreign Language. Longman, 1984, pp181-210.
DAVIS, F.B. Psychometric Research on Comprehension in Reading. The Literature of research in Reading with Emphasis on Models. East Brunswick, NJ: Iris, 1971.
DAVIS, F.B. Research in comprehension in Reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 3, 1968.
DAVIS, J.N. & BISTODEAU, L. How do L1 & L2 reading differ? Evidence from think aloud protocols Modern Language Journal , 77: 459-472, 1993.
DAVISON, A. & GREEN, G.M.  (Eds.) Linguistic complexity and text comprehension: Readability issues reconsidered.  Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988.
DAVISON, A. & KANTOR, R.N. On the failure of readability formulas to define readable text:  A case study from adaptations. Reading Research Quarterly,  17/2:187-209, 1982.  
DAVISON, A., WILSON, P., & HERMAN, G. Effects of syntactic connections and organising cues on text comprehension. Champaign, IL: Center for the Study of Reading, 1986.
de BEAUGRANDE, R. & DRESSLER, W. Introduction to Text Linguistics. London: Longman, 1981.
DEAN, R.S. & KULHAVY, R.W. Influence of spatial organization in prose learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76: 57-61, 1981. 
DEMEL, M.C. The relationship between overall reading comprehension and comprehension of coreferential ties for second language readers of English. TESOL Quarterly,  24/2: 267-292, 1990.
DEVINE, J. The relationship between general language competence and second language reading proficiency: Implication for teaching. 1988. In: CARRELL, P., DEVINE, J. & ESKEY, D. (Eds.) Research in reading in English as a second language. New York Cambridge University Press, 1988, pp. 260-277.
DOLE, J. , VALENCIA, S., GREEN, E.A. & WARDROP, J. Effects of two types of prereading instruction on the comprehension of narrative and expository text. Reading Research Quarterly, 26/2: 142-59, 1991.
DONIN, J. & SILVA, M. The relationship between first and second language reading comprehension of occupation-specific texts. Language Learning, 43/3: 373-401, 1993.
DUFFY, T.M. & KABANCE, P. Testing a readable writing approach to text revision Journal of Educational Psychology, 74: 733 -748, 1982.  
ESKEY, D. Holding in the bottom: An interactive approach to the language problems of second language readers. In CARRELL, P., DEVINE, J. & ESKEY, D. (Eds.)  Interactive approaches to second language reading. New York. Cambridge University Press, 1988, pp93-100.
ESKEY, D.E. & GRABE, W. Interactive models for second language reading. In: CARRELL, P.L., DEVINE, J. & ESKEY, D.E. Interactive approaches to second language reading. New York. Cambridge University Press, 1988, pp223-238.
EVANS, S. A brief statement of schema theory. Psychonomic Science, 8: 87-88, 1967. 
EVANS, S. Redundancy as a variable in pattern perception. Psychological Bulletin, 67: 104-113, 1967.
EVANS, R. & BALANCE, C. A comparison of sentence connective recall by two populations of readers. Journal of Educational Research, 73:324-329, 1980.
FASS, W & SCHUMACHER, G.M. Effects of motivation, subject activity, and readability on the retention of prose materials. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70: 803-807, 1978. 
FLAHIVE, D.E. & SNOW, B.G. Measures of syntactic complexity in evaluating ESL compositions. In: OLLER, J.W. (Jr) & PERKINS, K. (Eds.) Research in language testing. Rowley MA: Newbury House, 1980, pp171-176.
FLESCH, R. A new readability yardstick. Journal of Applied Psychology, 32: 221-233, 1947.
FLESCH, R. Marks of readable Style: A Study in Adult Education. New York: Bureau of Publications, Teachers College, Columbia University, 1943.
FLESCH, R. The Art of Plain Talk. New York: Harper and Brothers, 1946.
FLESCH, R. The Art of Readable Writing. New York, NY: Collier, 1962.
FLETCHER, C.R. Short-term memory processes in text comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 20: 564-574, 1981.
FLETCHER, C.R. & BLOOM, C. P. Causal reasoning in the comprehension of simple narrative texts. Journal of Memory and Language, 27: 235-244, 1986.
FLOYD, P. & CARRELL, P. Effects on ESL reading of teaching cultural content schemata. Language Learning, 37: 89-108, 1987.  
FRANCIS, W.N. & KUCERA, H. Frequency Analysis of English Usage. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1982.
FREEBODY, P. & ANDERSON, R.C. Effects of vocabulary difficulty, Text Cohesion and Schema Availability on Reading Comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 18:277-93, 1983.  
FRY, E. Teaching faster reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1963.
FRY, E. Judging readability of books. Teacher Education, 5: 34-9, 1964.
FRY, E. Fry's readability graph. Journal of Reading, 20: 242-52, 1977.
FRY, E.B. Reading formulas - maligned but valid. Journal of Reading, 32: 292-297, 1989.  
GARNHAM, A. Psycholinguistics: Central Topics. New York: Methuen, 1985.
GAY, T.O. Dinosaurs and their relatives in action. Intervisual books, Inc., 1993.
GEVA, E. Facilitating reading comprehension through flowcharting. Reading Research Quarterly, 18: 384-341, 1983.  
GEVA, E. Knowledge of conjunctions and its role in comprehension. Final Report submitted to the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (Contract No. 410-83-1230). Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, 1986.
GEVA, E.  The role of conjunctions in L2 text comprehension. TESOL Quarterly,  26/4: 731-747, 1992. 
GEVA, E. & RYAN, E.B. Use of conjunctions in expository texts by skilled and less skilled readers. Journal of Reading Behaviour, 17:331-346, 1985.
GILLILAND, J. Readability. London: University of London Press for the United Kingdom Reading Association, 1972.
GLENN, C.G. The role of episodic structure and of story length in children's recall of simple stories. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 17/2: 229-247, 1978.
GLENBERG, A.M. & LANGSTON, W.E. Comprehension of Illustrated Text: Pictures Help to Build Mental Models. Journal of Memory and Language, 31:129-151, 1992.
GOLDMAN, S.R. Learning from text: Reflections on the past and suggestions for the future. Discourse Processes,  23: 357-398, 1997.  
GOODMAN, K. Reading: A psycholinguistic guessing game. In: GUTHRIE, J.T. (Ed.) Comprehension and Teaching: Research Reviews. Newark, NJ:IRA, 1983.
GOUGH, P. One second of reading: Postscript. In: Singer, H. & Ruddell, R. (Eds.) Theoretical models and processes of reading. Newark DE: International reading Association. 1972, 3rd ed., pp687-688.
GRABE, W. Current Developments in Second Language Reading Research. TESOL quarterly, 25/3:375-406, 1991.
GRAY, W.S. & LEARY, B.E. What makes a book readable. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1935.
GRIBBIN, J & GRIBBIN, M. The Greenhouse Effect. Inside Science, New Scientist vol 151, no. 2037, 6th July 1996.
HALLIDAY, M.A.K. Differences between spoken and written language: Some implications for literacy teaching. In: PAGE, G., ELKINS, J., & O'CONNOR, B. (Eds.) Communication through reading: Proceedings of the Fourth Australian reading Conference, Adelaide, S.A.: Australian Reading Association, 1979, vol.2, pp37-52.
HALLIDAY, M.A.K. & HASAN, R. Cohesion in English. London: Longman, 1976.
HARTLEY, J. & DAVIES, I.K. Preinstructional strategies: The role of pretests, behavioural objectives, overviews, and advance organizers. Review of Educational Research, 46: 239-265, 1976.
HAVILAND, S.E. & CLARK, H.H. What's new? Acquiring new information as a process in comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour,  13: 512-521, 1974.
HOEY, M. On the Surface of Discourse. Allen & Unwin, 1983.
HOEY, M. & WINTER, E. Clause relations and the writer's communicative task. In: COUTURE, B. (Ed.) Functional Approaches to Writing Research Perspectives. London, Frances Pinter, 1986, pp120-141.
HOOVER, M.L. Effects of Textual and Cohesive Structure on Discourse Processing. Discourse Processes,  23: 193-120, 1997.   
HORIBA, Y, van den BROEK, P.W. & FLETCHER, C.R. Second Language Readers' Memory for Narrative Texts: Evidence for Structure-Preserving Top Down Processing. Language Learning, 43/3: 345-372, 1993.
HUDSON, T. A content comprehension approach to reading English for Science and Technology. TESOL Quarterly, 21/1: 77-104, 1991.
HUDSON, T., The effects of induced schemata on the "short circuit" in L2 reading: Non-decoding factors in L2 reading performance. Language Learning, 32: 1-31, 1982.
IRWIN, W.J. The effects of explicitness and clause order on the comprehension of reversible causal relationships. Reading Research Quarterly, 15:477-488, 1980.
IRWIN, J. & DAVIS, C.A. Assessing readability: The checklist approach. Journal of Reading, 24:  124-30, 1980.
IRWIN, J. & PULVER, C. Effects of explicitness, clause order and reversibility on children's comprehension of clausal relationships. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76:399-407,1984.
JACKSON, M.D. & McCLELLAND, J.L. Sensory and cognitive determinants of reading speed. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 14:565-574, 1975.
JOHNSON, D.D., PITTELMAN, S.D. & HEINLICH, J.E.  Semantic mapping. The Reading Teacher, 39: 778-783, 1986.
JOHNSON, L.L. Learning across the curriculum with creative graphing. Journal of Reading, 32: 509-519, 1989.
JOHNSON, P. Effects of building background knowledge. TESOL Quarterly, 16/4: 503-515, 1982.
JOHNSON, P. Effects on reading comprehension of language complexity and cultural background of a text TESOL Quarterly, 15/2: 169-182, 1981.
JOHNSON, P. & PEARSON, D.P. Prior knowledge, connectivity, and the assessment of reading. (Tech. Rep. No 245) Urbana-Champaign. University of Illinois. Center for the study of reading, 1982.
JONZ, J. Textual Cohesion and Second-Language Comprehension. Language Learning, 37/3: 409-438, 1987.
JONZ, J. Textual Sequence and second-language comprehension. Language Learning, 39/2: 207-250, 1989.
JUST, A.M. & CARPENTER, P.A. A theory of reading. From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87: 329-354, 1980.
KAIL, M. & WEISSENBORN,  J. The acquisition of connectives: Critiques and perspectives. Internal report. Laboratoire de Psychologie Expérimentale, University R. Descartes. In: MOSCATO, M. (Ed.) Le Language: Contribution et actualisation.. Rouen: Presses de l'Université de Rouen, 1984, pp101-120.
KAPLAN, R.B. Cultural thought patterns in inter-cultural education. Language Learning, 16: 1-20, 1966.
KAPLAN, R.B. The Anatomy of Rhetoric: Prolegomena to a Functional Theory of Rhetoric. Philadelphia: Center for Curriculum Development, 1972.
KAPLAN, R.B. Cultural thought patterns revisited. In CONNOR, U. & KAPLAN, R.B. (Eds.) Writing across Languages: Analysis of L2 Texts. Reading, MA : Addison-Wesley, 1987, pp9-12.
KELLY, P. Guessing: No substitute for systematic learning of lexis. System, 18: 199-207, 1990.
KERN, R. Second language reading strategy instruction: Its effects on comprehension and word inference ability. Modern Language Journal,  73: 135-149, 1989.
KIERAS, D.E. Good and bad structure in simple paragraphs: Effects an apparent theme, reading time, and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 17: 13-28, 1978. 
KIERAS, D.E. Initial mention as a signal to thematic content in technical passages. Memory and Cognition, 8: 345-353, 1980.
KINTSCH, W. The representation of meaning in memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1974.
KINTSCH, W. & KEENAN, J. Reading rate and retention as a function of the number of propositions in the base structure of sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 5: 257-274, 1973. KINTSCH, W., KOZMINSKY, E., STREBY, W.J., McKOON, G. & KEENAN, J.M. Comprehension and recall of text as a function of content variables. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 14:196-214, 1975.
KINTSCH, W., MANDEL, T. & KOZMINSKY, E. Summarizing scrambled stories. Memory and Cognition, 5: 547-552, 1977.
KINTSCH, W. & van DIJK, T. Toward a model of discourse comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85: 363-394, 1978. 
KINTSCH, W. & van DIJK, T. A. Comment on se rappelle et on résume des histoires. Languages, 40:98-116, 1975.
KINTSCH, W. & VIPOND, D. Reading comprehension and readability in educational practice and psychological theory. In: NILSSON, L.G. Perspectives on memory research. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1979. 
KLARE, G. Assessing readability. Reading Research Quarterly, 10: 62-102, 1974-75.
KLARE, G. Readability. In: PEARSON, P.D., BARR, R. KAMIL, M.L. & MOSENTHAL, P. (Eds.) The handbook of reading research. New York: Longman 1984 Vol. 1, pp681-731. 
KLARE, G. How to Write Readable English. London: Hutchinson and Co., Ltd., 1985.
KODA, K. The effects of transferred vocabulary knowledge on the development of L2 reading proficiency. Foreign Language Annals, 22: 529-540, 1989.
KRASHEN, S.D. The case for narrow reading. TESOL Newsletter, 15 (6):23, 1981.
KRASHEN, S.D. The input hypothesis: issues and implications. London: Longman, 1985.
KRUSE, A.F. Vocabulary in Context. English Language Teaching Journal, 33: 207-13, 1979.
LaBERGE, D. & SAMUELS, S.J. Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology 6: 293-323, 1974
LANDAUER, T.K., FOLTZ, P.W., & LAHAM, D. An Introduction to Latent Semantic Analysis. Discourse Processes, 25 (2&3): 259-284, 1998.
LASCARIDES, A. & ASHER, N.  Discourse relations and defeasible knowledge. In: Proceedings of the 29th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Morristown, NJ: Association for Computational Linguistics, 1991, pp.55-63.
LAUFER, B. (a) The lexical plight in second language reading. In: COADY, J. & HUCKIN, T. (Eds.) Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition. C.U.P., 1997.
LAUFER, B. (b) What's in a word that make it hard or easy: some intralexical factors that affect the learning of words. In SCHMITT, N., & M. McCARTHY, (Eds.) Vocabulary. Description, Acquisition and Pedagogy, C.U.P., 1997.
LAUFER, B. & SIM, D.D. (a) Measuring and explaining the threshold needed for English for Academic Purposes texts. Foreign Language Annals, 18: 405-413, 1985.
LAUFER, B. & SIM, D.D. (b) Taking the easy way out: Nonuse and misuse of contextual clues in EFL reading comprehension. English Teaching Forum, 23(2):7-10, 22, 1985.
LEE, J.F. Background knowledge and L2 reading. Modern Language Journal,  70: 350-354, 1986.
LEE, J. & MUSUMECI, D. On hierarchies of reading skills and text types Modern Language Journal, 72:173-87, 1988.
LEE, J.F. & RILEY, G.L. The effects of rereading, rhetorically-oriented frameworks on the recall of two structurally different expository texts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12: 25-41, 1990. 
LEVIN, J.R. Inducing comprehension in poor readers: A test of a recent model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 65: 19-24, 1973.
LIU, N. & NATION, I.S.P. Factors affecting guessing vocabulary in context. RELC Journal, 16 (1): 33-42, 1985. 
LOBAN, W. Stages, Velocity, and Prediction of Language Development: Kindergarten through Grade Twelve. Washington, DC: USOE, 1970.
LUNZER, E., WAITE, M. & DOLAN, T. Comprehension and comprehension tests. In Lunzer, E. & Gardner, K (Eds.) The effective use of reading. London: Heinemann Educational, 1979. 
MANDLER, J.M & JOHNSON, M.S. Remembrance of things parsed: story structure and recall. Cognitive Psychology, 9: 111-151, 1977.
MANN, W.C. & THOMPSON, S.A. Relational propositions in discourse. Discourse Processes, 9:57-90, 1986.
MANN, W.C. & THOMPSON, S.A. Rhetorical Structure Theory: A theory of text organization. (Tech. Rep. No RR/87/190). Marina del Rey, CA: Information Sciences Institute, 1987.
MANN, W.C. & THOMPSON, S.A. Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a functional theory of text organisation. Text, 8/3: 243-81, 1988.
MARTIN, J.R. English Text: systems and structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1992.
MAYER, R.E. Structural analysis of science prose: Can we increase problem-solving performance?. In: BRITTON, B. & BLACK, J. (Eds.) Understanding Expository Text: A Theoretical and Practical Handbook for Analyzing Explanatory Text. Hillsdale, NJ.: Erlbaum, 1985, pp 65-87.
MAYER, R.E. How to analyze science prose. In: BRITTON, B. & BLACK, J. (Eds.) Understanding Expository Text: A Theoretical and Practical Handbook for Analyzing Explanatory Text. Hillsdale, NJ.: Erlbaum, 1985, pp 305-313,
McCLURE, E. & GEVA, E. The development of the cohesive use of adversative conjunctions in discourse. Discourse Processes, 6:411-432, 1983.
McGEE, L.M. Awareness of text structure: effects on children's recall of expository text. Reading Research Quarterly, 17/4: 581-590, 1982.  
McGEE, L.M. & RICHGELS, D.J. Teaching expository structure to elementary students. The Reading Teacher, 38:739-748, 1985.   
McKEOWN, M. & CURTIS, M. (Eds.) The nature of vocabulary acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1987. 
McKOON, G. & RATCLIFFE, R. Inference during reading. Psychological review, 99:440-466, 1992.
MEYER, B.J.F. (a) The Organisation of Prose and its Effects on Memory. New York: North Holland, 1975. 
MEYER, B.J.F. (b) The organization of prose and its implications for the study of reading and memory. Journal of Reading Behaviour, 7:7-47, 1975.
MEYER, B.J.F. (c) The Organization of prose on its effect on recall. Amsterdam, 1975.
MEYER, B.J.F. The structure of prose: effects on learning and memory and implications for educational practice. In: ANDERSON, R.C., SPIRO, R.J. & MONTAGUE, W.E. (Eds.) Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge. Hillsdale N.J.: Erlbaum, 1977, pp179-208.
MEYER, B. Prose analysis: Purposes, procedures and problems In: BRITTON, B. & BLACK, J. (Eds.) Understanding Expository Text: A Theoretical and Practical Handbook for Analyzing Explanatory Text. Hillsdale, NJ.: Erlbaum, 1985, pp 269-304.
MEYER, B.J.F. Organizational patterns in prose and their use in reading. In: KAMIL, M.L. & ALDEN, J.M. (Eds.) Reading research: studies and applications. Clemson South Carolina: National Reading Conference, 1979, pp109-117.
MEYER, B.J.F., BRANDT, D.N. & BLUTH, G.J. Use of top-level structure in text: Key for reading comprehension of ninth-grade students. Reading Research Quarterly, 16: 72-103, 1981.  
MEYER, B.J.F. & FREEDLE, R.O. Effects of discourse type on recall. American Educational Research Journal, 21/1: 121-143, 1984.
MILLER, G.A. & CHOMSKY, N. Finitary models of language users. In: LUCE, R.D., BUSH, R.R. & GALANTER, E. (Eds.) Handbook of mathematical psychology. New York: Wiley, 1963
MILLER, J.R. & KINTSCH, W. Readability and recall of short prose passages: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human learning and Memory, 6. 335-354,1980.
MOON, R.E. Vocabulary connections: multi-word items in English. In: SCHMITT, N. & McCARTHY, M. Vocabulary. Description, Acquisition and Pedagogy. C.U.P., 1997, pp40 - 63.   
MORGAN, J. & SELLNER, M. Discourse and linguistics. In: SPIRO, R., BRUCE, B. &
MORGAN, J.L. & SELLNER, M.R. Discourse and Linguistic theory. In: SPIRO, R.J., BERTRAM, B.C. & BREWER, WF. (Eds.) Theoretical Issues in Reading Comprehension. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1980.
MYERS, G. Lexical cohesion and specialized knowledge in science and popular science tests. Discourse Processes, 14: 1-25, 1991.
NATION, P. & COADY, J. Vocabulary and reading. In: Carter, R. & McCarthy, M. (Eds.), Vocabulary and language teaching. Longman, 1988, pp 97-110.
NATION, P. & WARING, R. Vocabulary size, text coverage and word lists. In: SCHMITT, N. & McCARTHY, M. Vocabulary. Description, Acquisition and Pedagogy. C.U.P., 1997, pp6-19.
NATTINGER, J.R. & DeCARRICO, J.S. Lexical Phrases and Language teaching. O.U.P., 1992. 
NOORDMAN, L.G.M. Inferring from Language. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1979.
NUTTALL, C. Teaching Reading Skills in a Foreign Language. Heinemann, 1982.
O'BRIEN, E.J., RANEY, G.E., ALBRECHT, J.E. & RAYNER, K. Processes Involved in the Resolution of Explicit Anaphors. Discourse Processes, 23: 1-24, 1997,    
O'BRIEN, T. Rhetorical structure analysis and the case of the inaccurate, incoherent source-hopper. Applied Linguistics, 16/4: 442-482, 1995. 
PARAN, A. Reading in EFL: facts and fictions. ELT Journal, 50/1: 25-34, 1996.
PARRY, K. Culture, literacy and L2 reading. TESOL Quarterly,  30/4: 665-692, 1996.
PERFETTI, C. There are generalized abilities and one of them is reading. In: RESNICK, L. (Ed.) Knowing, Learning and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glazer. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1989, pp307-334.  
PERKINS, K. & ANGELIS, P.J. Schematic concept formation: concurrent validity for attained English as a second language reading comprehension? Language Learning, 35/2: 269-286, 1985. 
PERKINS, K. & BRUTTEN, S.R. Using a Facet Design to Assess the Effect of the Form, the Source, and the Frequency of Information Necessary to Answer ESL Reading Comprehension Questions. Language Learning, 38/2: 171-185, 1988.
PERKINS, K. & JONES, B. Measuring passage contribution in ESL reading comprehension. TESOL Quarterly, 19/1: 137-153, 1985.
PHILLIPS, J.K. A Study of the Applicability of Task Analysis Methodology and Learning Hierarchies to Second Language Reading. Diss., Ohio State Univ., 1974.
PRICE, J. How to Write a Computer Manual: A Handbook of Software Documentation. Menlo Park, California: Benjamin/Cummings, 1984.
PRITCHARD, R. The effects of cultural schemata on reading processing strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 25/4: 273-95, 1990.  
RASCO, R.W., TENNYSON, R.D. & BOUTWELL, R.C. Imagery instructions and drawing in learning prose. Journal of Educational Psychology,  67: 188-192, 1975.
RAYNER, K. Comprehension Process: An introduction. In: BALOTA, D.A., FLORES D'ARCAIS, G.B. & RAYNER, K. (Eds.) Comprehension processes in reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1990, pp1-6.
READ, J. Vocabulary and Testing. In: SCHMITT, N. & McCARTHY, M. Vocabulary. Description, Acquisition and Pedagogy. C.U.P., 1997, pp303-320.
REUTZEL, D.R. Story maps improve comprehension. The Reading Teacher, 38: 400-404, 1985.
RICHGELS, D.J., McGEE, L.M., LOMAY, R.G. & SHEARD, C. Awareness of four text structures: Effects on recall. Reading Research Quarterly, 22: 177-196, 1987.
ROSENSHINE, B.V. Skill hierarchies in reading comprehension. In: SPIRO, R.J., BRUCE, B. & BREWER, W. (eds.)  Theoretical Issues in Reading Comprehension. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum, 1980.
ROYER, J.M. & CABLE, G.W. Illustrations, analogies and facilitative transfer in prose learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68: 205-209, 1976.
RUMELHART, D.E. Introduction to Human Information Processing. New York: Wiley, 1977. RUMELHART, D.E. Schemata: the building blocks of cognition. In SPIRO, R.J., BRUCE, B. & BREWER, W. (Eds.)  Theoretical Issues in Reading Comprehension. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum, 1980.
RUMELHART, D.E. Notes on a schema for stories. In D.G. BOBROW & A.M. COLLINS (Eds.) Representation and understanding. New York: Academic Press, 1975.
RUTHERFORD, W.E. Second Language Grammar: Learning and Teaching. Longman, 1987.
SAMUELS, S.J. Effects of pictures on learning to read, comprehension and attitudes. Review of Educational Research, 40:397-407, 1970.  
SANDERS, T. Semantic and Pragmatic Sources of Coherence: On the categorization of coherence relations in context. Discourse Processes,  24: 119-147, 1997.
SANDERS, T.J.M., SPOOREN, W.P.M. & NOORDMAN, L.G.M. Toward a Taxonomy of Coherence Relations. Discourse Processes, 15: 1-35, 1992.
SCHANK, R.C. & ABELSON, R. Scripts, plans, goals and understanding. Hillsdale, N.J.:Erlbaum, 1977.
SCHLEPPEGRELL, M.J. Subordination and Linguistic Complexity. Discourse Processes, 15: 117-131, 1992.
SCHMITT, N. & McCARTHY, M. Vocabulary. Description, Acquisition and Pedagogy. C.U.P., 1997.
SCHWARTZ, M.N.K. & FLAMMER, A. Text structure and title - Effects on comprehension and Recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 20: 61-66, 1981.
SINATRA, R., STAHL-GEMAKE, J. & MORGAN, N.W. Using semantic mapping after reading to organize and write original discourse. Journal of Reading, 30: 4-13, 1986. 
SINGER, H. The SEER technique: A Non-Computational Procedure for Quickly Estimating readability Level. Journal of Reading Behaviour, 7:255-67, 1975.
SINGER, M.  Causal Validation and Causal Comprehension. In: LORCH, R.F. & O'BRIEN, E.J. (eds.) Sources of Coherence in Reading. Lawrence Erlbaum, 1995, pp241-261.
SINGER, H. & DONLAN, D. Active comprehension: problem-solving schema with question generation for comprehension of complex short stories. Reading Research Quarterly, 17/2: 166-186, 1982.
SMITH, C.S. Factors of Linguistic Complexity and Performance. In: DAVISON, A. & GREEN, G.M.  (Eds.) Linguistic complexity and text comprehension: Readability issues reconsidered.  Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988, pp247-279.
SPIRO, R.J., BRUCE, B. & BREWER, W. (Eds.)  Theoretical Issues in Reading Comprehension. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum, 1980.
STAHL, S.A. & VANCIL, S.J. Discussion is what makes semantic maps work in vocabulary instruction. The Reading Teacher, 40: 62-67, 1986.   
STANOVICH, K.E. Toward an interactive-compensatory model of individual differences in the development of reading fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 16:32-71, 1980.
STANOVICH, K. E. Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21: 360-407, 1986.
STEFFENSEN, M.S., JOAG-DEV, C., & ANDERSON, R.C. A cross-cultural perspective on reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 15: 10-29, 1979.
STEFFENSEN, M.S. & JOAG-DEV, C., Cultural knowledge and reading. In: ALDERSON, J.C. & URQUHART, A.H. (Eds.) Reading in a Foreign Language. Longman, 1984, pp 48-64.
STROTHER, J. & ULIJN, J. Does syntactic rewriting affect English for Science and Technology (EST) text comprehension? In: DEVINE, J., CARRELL, P. & ESKEY, D (Eds.) Research in reading in English as a second language. Washington, DC: TESOL, 1987, pp.89-101.
SWAFFAR, J., ARENS, K., & BYRNES, H. Reading for meaning: An integrated approach to language learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1991.
SWAFFAR, J.K. Reading authentic texts in a foreign language: A cognitive model. Modern Language Journal,  69 15-33, 1985.
SWAFFAR, J.K. Readers, texts, and second languages: The interactive processes. Modern Language Journal,  72: 123-149, 1988.
TAGLIEBER, L. JOHNSON, L. & YARBROUGH, D. Effectiveness of prereading activities on EFL reading by Brazilian college students TESOL Quarterly,  22/3: 455-472, 1988.
TANG, G. The effects of graphic representation of knowledge structures on ESL reading comprehension. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14: 177-195, 1992. 
TAYLOR, B. Children's memory for expository text after reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 15: 399-411, 1980.  
TAYLOR, W.L.  Cloze Procedure: A New Tool for Measuring readability. Journalism Quarterly, 30, (Fall, 1953) pp415-433.
TEMPLETON, S., & MOWERY, S. Readability, basal readers, and story grammar: What lies beneath the surface? Reading World, March 1985, pp40-47.
THORNDIKE, E.L. The Teacher's Word Book. New York: Teacher's College, Columbia University, 1921. 
THORNDIKE, E.L.  Reading as reasoning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 8: 323-332, 1971.
THORNDYKE, P.W. Cognitive Structures in Comprehension and Memory of Narrative Discourse. Cognitive Psychology, 9:77-110, 1977.   
TYLER, A. The role of syntactic structure in discourse structure: Signalling logical and prominence relations Applied Linguistics, 15/3: 243-262, 1994.
ULIJN, J.M. & KEMPEN, G.A.M. The role of the first language in second language reading comprehension: Some experimental evidence. In G. Nickel (Ed.) Proceedings of the 4th International Congress of Applied Linguistics, vol 1. Hochschulverlag, Stuttgart, 1976, pp495-507.
ULIJN, J.M. & STROTHER, J.B. The effect of syntactic simplification on reading EST texts as L1 and L2. Journal of Research in Reading, 13: 38-54, 1990.
URQUHART, A.H. The effect of rhetorical ordering on readability. In: ALDERSON, J.C. & URQUHART, A.H. (eds.) Reading in a Foreign Language. Longman. 1984, pp160-175.
VOGEL, M. & WASHBURNE, C. An objective method of determining grade placement of children's reading material. Elementary School Journal, 28:373-381, 1928.
WASON, P.C. & JOHNSON-LAIRD, P.N. Psychology of reasoning: Structure and content. London: Batsford, 1972.
WHALEY, J.F. Readers expectations of story structures. Reading Research Quarterly, 17: 90-114, 1981.
WILLIAMS, E AND MORAN, C. Reading in a foreign language at intermediate and advanced levels with particular reference to English. Language Teaching,. 22/4:217-28, 1989.
WILLIAMS, R. & DALLAS, D.  Aspects of Vocabulary in the readability of content area L2 educational textbooks: a case study. In: ALDERSON, J.C. & URQUHART, A.H. (eds.) Reading in a Foreign Language. Longman, 1984, pp119-211.
WING, C.S. & SCHOLNICK, E.K. Children's comprehension of pragmatic concepts expressed in "because", "although", "if", and "unless" Journal of Child Language, 8:347-365, 1981.
WINTER, E.O. Towards a Contextual Grammar of English. Allen & Unwin, 1982.
WINTER, E.O. A clause-relational approach to English texts; a study of some predictive lexical items in written discourse. Instructional Science, 6/1: 1-92, 1977.
WOOD, K.D. & MATEJA, J.A. Adapting secondary level strategies for use in elementary schools. The Reading Teacher, 36/6: 492-496, 1983.  
XIAOLONG, L. Effects of Contextual Cues on Inferring and Remembering Meanings of New Words. Applied Linguistics, 9/4:402-413, 1988.
YORIO, C. Some sources of reading problems for foreign language learners. Language Learning. 21/1: 107-115, 1971.
ZAKALUK, B.L. & SAMUELS, S.J. Toward a new approach to predicting text comprehensibility. In: ZAKALUK, B.L. & SAMUELS, S.J. (Eds.) Readability: its past, present and future. Newark, DE: International Reading Association, 1988, pp121-143.
ZINAR, S. Fifth graders' recall of propositional content and causal relationships from expository prose. Journal of Reading Behaviour, 22:181-199, 1990.
ZWAAN, R.A. & van OOSTENDORP, H. Do readers construct spatial representations in naturalistic story comprehension? Discourse Processes, 16, 125-145, 1993.

      © 2007 Essem Educational Limited